TrainingPeaks is a name that comes up often when a coach looks for a training-tracking tool, but it isn't always the best fit for every need. This article, part of the guide to athlete tracking for sports coaches, compares what the tool does well against when an alternative fits the need better.

What TrainingPeaks Does Well

TrainingPeaks is a well-established reference for training planning, especially in endurance sports (running, cycling, triathlon) where it integrates well with watch and sensor data. Its depth of analysis for endurance metrics (power, pace, heart rate) remains a strength that's hard to match.

The Limits for a Coach Who Also Runs a Business

The interface is in English, which can be a barrier for athletes less comfortable with the language. More importantly, the tool focuses on training tracking and doesn't cover client management (payments, scheduling, reminders), which an independent coach has to handle separately with other tools.

Everything centralized

Training tracking and client management in a single tool.

Get started for free

What a Tool Like ProJump Adds

Unlike TrainingPeaks, ProJump calculates training load (duration × RPE) the same way for every sport, including those that wearables don't capture well (strength training, team sports, combat sports). See Calculate Training Load : The RPE Method for the details of this method. ProJump also adds payment and scheduling tracking, covering business management alongside training tracking.

How to Choose Based on Your Own Needs

The choice mostly depends on the sport you coach and what you want to centralize. For a coach exclusively tracking endurance sports measured by sensors, TrainingPeaks remains relevant. For a coach handling varied sports who wants to combine training tracking with client management, a tool like the one described in Planning a Typical Training Week becomes a better fit.

Key takeaways

  • TrainingPeaks remains a solid reference for endurance sports measured by wearables.
  • Its English-only interface and lack of client management are its main limits for an independent coach.
  • The duration × RPE load calculation works across all sports, including those a watch captures poorly.
  • The right choice depends on the sport you coach and what you want to centralize day to day.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TrainingPeaks a bad tool?

No, it's a well-established reference for training planning, especially in endurance sports.

Why look for an alternative then?

Some coaches want a tool that also covers client management (payments, scheduling) alongside training tracking.

Does TrainingPeaks work for every sport?

It's mostly built for endurance sports measured by wearable data, less so for strength training or team sports.

Do I need to migrate all my data when switching tools?

It depends on the destination tool: some allow a partial import, others require starting fresh.

Does a French-language tool actually make a difference?

For a coach communicating mainly in French with their athletes, a French interface and support simplify day-to-day use.